Current:Home > reviewsMassachusetts lawmakers target "affirmative action for the wealthy" -WealthPro Academy
Massachusetts lawmakers target "affirmative action for the wealthy"
View
Date:2025-04-18 15:22:32
So-called legacy college admissions — or giving preference to the children of alumni — is coming under new scrutiny following the Supreme Court's ruling last week that scraps the use of affirmative action to pick incoming students.
Lawmakers in Massachusetts are proposing a new fee that would be levied on the state's colleges and universities that use legacy preferences when admitting students, including Harvard University and Williams College, a highly ranked small liberal arts college. Any money raised by the fee would then be used to fund community colleges within the state.
The proposed law comes as a civil rights group earlier this month sued Harvard over legacy admissions at the Ivy League school, alleging the practice discriminates against students of color by giving an unfair advantage to the mostly White children of alumni. Harvard and Williams declined to comment on the proposed legislation.
Highly ranked schools such as Harvard have long relied on admissions strategies that, while legal, are increasingly sparking criticism for giving a leg up to mostly White, wealthy students. Legacy students, the children of faculty and staff, recruited athletes and kids of wealthy donors represented 43% of the White students admitted to Harvard, a 2019 study found.
"Legacy preference, donor preference and binding decision amount to affirmative action for the wealthy," Massachusetts Rep. Simon Cataldo, one of the bill's co-sponsors, told CBS MoneyWatch.
The Massachusetts lawmakers would also fine colleges that rely on another strategy often criticized as providing an unfair advantage to students from affluent backgrounds: early-decision applications, or when students apply to a school before the general admissions round.
Early decision usually has a higher acceptance rate than the general admissions pool, but it typically draws wealthier applicants
because early applicants may not know how much financial aid they could receive before having to decide on whether to attend.
Because Ivy League colleges now routinely cost almost $90,000 a year, it's generally the children of the very rich who can afford to apply for early decision.
"At highly selective schools, the effect of these policies is to elevate the admissions chances of wealthy students above higher-achieving students who don't qualify as a legacy or donor prospect, or who need to compare financial aid packages before committing to a school," Cataldo said.
$100 million from Harvard
The proposed fee as part of the bill would be levied on the endowments of colleges and universities that rely on such strategies. Cataldo estimated that the law would generate over $120 million in Massachusetts each year, with $100 million of that stemming from Harvard.
That's because Harvard has a massive endowment of $50.9 billion, making it one of the nation's wealthiest institutions of higher education. In 2020, the university had the largest endowment in the U.S., followed by Yale and the University of Texas college system, according to the National Center for Education Statistics.
Not all colleges allow legacy admissions. Some institutions have foresworn the practice, including another Massachusetts institution, MIT. The tech-focused school also doesn't use binding early decision.
"Just to be clear: we don't do legacy," MIT said in an admissions blog post that it points to as explaining its philosophy. "[W]e simply don't care if your parents (or aunt, or grandfather, or third cousin) went to MIT."
It added, "So to be clear: if you got into MIT, it's because you got into MIT. Simple as that."
"Good actors" in higher education, like MIT, wouldn't be impacted by the proposed fee, Cataldo noted.
- In:
- College
veryGood! (6)
Related
- A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
- Inside Clean Energy: Electric Vehicles Are Having a Banner Year. Here Are the Numbers
- Roy Wood Jr. wants laughs from White House Correspondents' speech — and reparations
- North Carolina Hurricanes Linked to Increases in Gastrointestinal Illnesses in Marginalized Communities
- The FBI should have done more to collect intelligence before the Capitol riot, watchdog finds
- Tucker Carlson Built An Audience For Conspiracies At Fox. Where Does It Go Now?
- Election skeptics may follow Tucker Carlson out of Fox News
- Meet the 'financial hype woman' who wants you to talk about money
- Meet first time Grammy nominee Charley Crockett
- Fernanda Ramirez Is “Obsessed With” This Long-Lasting, Non-Sticky Lip Gloss
Ranking
- SFO's new sensory room helps neurodivergent travelers fight flying jitters
- Inside Clean Energy: Taking Stock of the Energy Storage Boom Happening Right Now
- How Prince Harry and Prince William Are Joining Forces in Honor of Late Mom Princess Diana
- Bed Bath & the great Beyond: How the home goods giant went bankrupt
- Sarah J. Maas books explained: How to read 'ACOTAR,' 'Throne of Glass' in order.
- Amid Punishing Drought, California Is Set to Adopt Rules to Reduce Water Leaks. The Process has Lagged
- Inside Clean Energy: Here’s What the 2021 Elections Tell Us About the Politics of Clean Energy
- Why Did California Regulators Choose a Firm with Ties to Chevron to Study Irrigating Crops with Oil Wastewater?
Recommendation
NHL in ASL returns, delivering American Sign Language analysis for Deaf community at Winter Classic
When your boss is an algorithm
10 Trendy Amazon Jewelry Finds You'll Want to Wear All the Time
In the San Francisco Bay Area, the Pandemic Connects Rural Farmers and Urban Communities
What to watch: O Jolie night
Charlie Puth Blasts Trend of Throwing Objects at Performers After Kelsea Ballerini's Onstage Incident
The Year in Climate Photos
AI-generated deepfakes are moving fast. Policymakers can't keep up